|
Top 100 Energy Saving Tips
|
There are hundreds of different ways to save energy.
Here are the top tips to save energy with Variable
Speed AC Drives. Follow the links to learn more!
|
|
Auditor visit from ABB representative
|
The energy efficiency of different machines in an industrial plant is
not quite easy to see without a closer study and analysing. If the plant
has no suitable personnel for doing this work, there is an opportunity
to call an ABB representative for auditing. He has been trained to use
suitable measuring equipment software tools and analysing methods to
find the most profitable targets for upgrading.
Benefits:
Reliable specialist doing the work
Own resources saved for daily work
Possibility to get financial advice from ABB
[Top of the page]
[Tips by Industry]
[Tips by Application]
[Alphabetical Index]
|
|
|
Boiler coal mills - AC drive instead of bypass
|
In a boiler installation 20 coal mills with a drive output of 710 kW each
are used. A speed-controlled drive with a control coupling or with an AC drive
is to replace the bypass method. The possible saving with a control coupling is
about 11 GWh and with an AC drive 23 GWh as shown below.
Energy save about 23,000,000 kWh/year
Reduction in CO2 emissions 11,500,000 kg/year
Other benefits:
Better boiler control with fewer losses
Grushing wheels of the mills last longer
Payback period 2.5 years
[Top of the page]
[Tips by Industry]
[Tips by Application]
[Alphabetical Index]
|
|
|
Duty Cycle has to be considered
|
It is important to consider the duty cycle of the controlled system.
The energy saving with a variable speed drive can be compared in Case 1
and Case 2 shown in the chart.
Case 1 with new motor:
Energy save about 84,000 kWh/year
Reduction in CO2 emissions 42,000 kg/year
Case 2 with AC drive:
Energy save about 230,000 kWh/year
Reduction in CO2 emissions 115,000 kg/year
The rule of thumb:
Install an AC drive if significant flow variations occur
Install a lower speed motor if flow variation is small but motor/pump is too large
[Top of the page]
[Tips by Industry]
[Tips by Application]
[Alphabetical Index]
|
|
|
Efficiency optimised by AC drive
|
Pump or fan efficiency is usually as highest around the rated flow and head (A = 78%).
In case the flow rate is reduced by speed control, the efficiency stays close to the maximum
(B = 77%). In case the flow is reduced by throttling the efficiency is much lower
(C = 60%). If we look at a 100 kW pump motor and 5000 h/year, we get:
Energy save about 85,000 kWh/year
Reduction in CO2 emissions 42,500 kg/year
The rule of thumb:
Install an AC drive instead of throttling if significant flow variations occur
[Top of the page]
[Tips by Industry]
[Tips by Application]
[Alphabetical Index]
|
|
|
Energy taxes can be avoided
|
Many countries in Europe are introducing some form of energy tax to
encourage more efficient use of energy. In the UK, the government estimates that
its Climate Change Levy will cut CO2 emissions by 2,5 Million tonnes a year by
2010. Another initiative to encourage the adoption of energy-saving equipment is
a tax incentive - Enhanced Capital Allowances (ECA) - that will allow companies
to write off 100% of the cost of certain type of equipment like AC drives.
Estimated energy savings 5 billion kWh/year
Reduction in CO2 emissions 2,5 billion kg/year
[Top of the page]
[Tips by Industry]
[Tips by Application]
[Alphabetical Index]
|
|
|
Fan speed control instead of dampers
|
In the past the control of air flow rates from fans was not concerned
with reduced energy consumption. Although there are number of methods
to control flow rates, not all are energy efficient. The most basic
and inefficient way of controlling the flow rate is the adjustment of
a damper in the ventilation duct. Using instead AC drive with 30 kW
motor running 5000 hours/year:
Total energy savings 76,500 kWh/year
Reduction in CO2 emissions 38,250 kg/year
Other benefits:
Soft starting less maintenance
Short payback period
Better flow control
[Top of the page]
[Tips by Industry]
[Tips by Application]
[Alphabetical Index]
|
|
|
Fan speed control instead of inlet vanes
|
In the past the control of air flow rates from fans was not concerned
with reduced energy consumption. Although there are number of methods
to control flow rates, not all are energy efficient. Inlet guide vanes
are more sophisticated method for flow control, but using AC drive
instead in case of 30 kW motor running 5000 hours/year:
Total energy savings 37,500 kWh/year
Reduction in CO2 emissions 18,750 kg/year
Other benefits:
Soft starting less maintenance
Simpler fan construction
Better flow control
[Top of the page]
[Tips by Industry]
[Tips by Application]
[Alphabetical Index]
|
|
|
Fan speed control instead of on-off
|
In the past the control of air flow rates from fans was not concerned
with reduced energy consumption. Although there are number of methods
to control flow rates, not all are energy efficient. A very basic
way of controlling the flow rate is to modulate the fans on or off.
Using AC drive instead in case of 30 kW motor running 5000 hours/year:
Total energy savings 51,000 kWh/year
Reduction in CO2 emissions 25,500 kg/year
Other benefits:
Soft starting less maintenance
Much better flow control
Better comfort for people
[Top of the page]
[Tips by Industry]
[Tips by Application]
[Alphabetical Index]
|
|
|
Fan speed control instead of two-speed motor
|
In the past the control of air flow rates from fans was not concerned
with reduced energy consumption. Although there are number of methods
to control flow rates, not all are energy efficient. A quite simple
way of controlling the flow rate is the use of two-speed motor,
but it has two flow rates only. Using AC drive instead in case of 30 kW
motor running 5000 hours/year:
Total energy savings 52,500 kWh/year
Reduction in CO2 emissions 26,250 kg/year
Other benefits:
Soft starting less maintenance
Short payback period
Better flow control
[Top of the page]
[Tips by Industry]
[Tips by Application]
[Alphabetical Index]
|
|
|
FanSave for fan energy calculations
|
FanSave is a Visual Basic Application for MS Excel to estimate the energy
savings available when using an adjustable frequency drive compared to
other fan control systems. Calculations are based on typical fan
operating characteristics. Results should be used only for estimating
purposes. The outputs of the calculations are:
Total energy savings kWh/year
Total energy cost savings Currency unit/year
Direct payback period
Other benefits:
Quick way to make alternative calculations
Simple drive selection is included
Available on the web
[Top of the page]
[Tips by Industry]
[Tips by Application]
[Alphabetical Index]
|
|
|
Hospital HVAC control - AC drive instead throttling
|
A Finnish hospital wanted to reduce the energy wasted with ventilation exhaust air.
The hospital's HVAC system vas renewed with the advanced building control system with
heat recovery and 60 AC drives (2.2 - 37 kW). As a result the specific heat energy
consumption is now lower than in any other hospital in the county.
Energy save about 4,840,000 kWh/year
Reduction in CO2 emissions 2,420,000 kg/year
Other benefits:
Specific heat consumption reduced by 30%
Improved quality of air conditioning
Estimated payback period 4 years
[Top of the page]
[Tips by Industry]
[Tips by Application]
[Alphabetical Index]
|
|
|
Milking machine - AC drive instead of relief valve
|
A US manufacturer replaced the mechanical vacuum controller in their
milking machine with a variable speed AC drive (22 kW/5 hours/day). The mechanical
controller was replaced with a vacuum transducer giving the pressure signal to the
AC drive. Because of the fluctuating milk volume the energy savings were remarkable:
Energy save about 26,800 kWh/year
Reduction in CO2 emissions 13,400 kg/year
Other benefits:
Reduced noise and heat
More pleasant working environment
Increased life time of mechanical parts
[Top of the page]
[Tips by Industry]
[Tips by Application]
[Alphabetical Index]
|
|
|
New AC motor instead of old motor
|
Efficiency Tool is a Visual Basic Application for MS Excel to estimate
the energy savings when replacing an old AC drive, motor or both drive and motor
with new equipment. This example is calculated for the Malt kiln case
above assuming that only the motor is replaced.
Energy save about 11,520 kWh/year
Reduction in CO2 emissions 5,760 kg/year
Other benefits:
Less equipment space
Less cooling capacity needed
Possibility to limit the peak power
[Top of the page]
[Tips by Industry]
[Tips by Application]
[Alphabetical Index]
|
|
|
Pulp mill pumps - AC drive instead of throttling
|
A Swedish pulp mill discovered that at 850 kWh per pulp ton, its energy
consumption was far too high. Variable speed control of pumps, changing
too large pump motors with more suitable and making changes in pipe layouts
were the actions causing a reduction to 635 kWh per pulp ton. With variable
speed AC drives:
Energy save about 134,400,000 kWh/year
Reduction in CO2 emissions 67,200,000 kg/year
Other benefits:
Improved pulp process control
Less maintenance by soft starting
Return on hardware investment about 12 months.
[Top of the page]
[Tips by Industry]
[Tips by Application]
[Alphabetical Index]
|
|
|
Pump speed control instead of recirculation
|
Centrifugal pumps can be controlled by methods similar to those for
controlling fans. In practice, the most common method is throttling
by means of a control valve. Recirculation is also used, but it is
most inefficient in energy point of view. Using AC drive instead
in case of 30 kW motor running 5000 hours/year:
Total energy savings 100,500 kWh/year
Reduction in CO2 emissions 50,250 kg/year
Other benefits:
Soft starting less maintenance
Short payback period
Better flow control
[Top of the page]
[Tips by Industry]
[Tips by Application]
[Alphabetical Index]
|
|
|
Pump speed control instead of throttling
|
Centrifugal pumps can be controlled by methods similar to those for
controlling fans. In practice, the most common method is throttling
by means of a control valve. Throttling causes quite a lot of losses
both in the pump and in the valve itself. Using AC drive instead
in case of 30 kW motor running 5000 hours/year:
Total energy savings 58,500 kWh/year
Reduction in CO2 emissions 29,250 kg/year
Other benefits:
Soft starting less maintenance
Short payback period
Better flow control
[Top of the page]
[Tips by Industry]
[Tips by Application]
[Alphabetical Index]
|
|
|
PumpSave for pump energy calculations
|
PumpSave is a Visual Basic Application for MS Excel to estimate the energy
savings available when using an adjustable frequency drive compared to
other pump control systems. Calculations are based on typical pump
operating characteristics. Results should be used only for estimating
purposes. The outputs of the calculations are:
Total energy savings kWh/year
Total energy cost savings Currency unit/year
Direct payback period
Other benefits:
Quick way to make alternative calculations
Simple drive selection is included
Available on the web
[Top of the page]
[Tips by Industry]
[Tips by Application]
[Alphabetical Index]
|
|
|
River water axial pump control - AC drive instead of throttling
|
In a river-water pumping station, an axial pump with a rated output of 1500 kW
is used. Considering the energy efficiency for partial load the axial pump at
constant speed and with throttling as flow-rate control is extremely inefficient.
In contrast to this, the pump output can be matched to the output of the installation
with low losses if electronic speed control is used.
Total energy savings 2,386,000 kWh/year
Reduction in CO2 emissions 1,193,000 kg/year
Other benefits:
Soft starting less maintenance
Payback period one year
Energy saving 32 per cent
[Top of the page]
[Tips by Industry]
[Tips by Application]
[Alphabetical Index]
|
|
|
Saw mill conveyor - AC drive instead of two-speed motor
|
Most of sawmills today use AC drives to control the speed of sawmill
line conveyor according to the timber diameter. In this example the average
line speed can be increased 13 per cent if compared to two-speed motor. The
energy saving can be estimated to be 13 per cent as well. The power of line
motors is about 100 kW and the running hours about 5000 hours a year.
Energy save about 65,000 kWh/year
Reduction in CO2 emissions 32,000 kg/year
Other benefits:
Better quality of the end product
Protection against too high load
Less reactive power
[Top of the page]
[Tips by Industry]
[Tips by Application]
[Alphabetical Index]
|
|
|
Ship podded propulsion - AC Drive instead of pitch control
|
A recent innovation for enhanced maneuverability and reduced fuel
consumption is Azipod, a podded propulsion unit azimuthing through
360 degrees. It incorporates an electric motor which is controlled by a
frequency converter. On a recently launched cruise liner reduction
in fuel consumption was 8 per cent equivalent to 40 tons of heavy
fuel oil per week.
Energy save about 10,000,000 kWh/year
Reduction in CO2 emissions 5,000,000 kg/year
Other benefits:
Improved maneuverability
Reduced stress to the supply
Reduced reactive power
[Top of the page]
[Tips by Industry]
[Tips by Application]
[Alphabetical Index]
|
|
|
Sewage pump - AC drive instead of throttling
|
For an outdoor pumping station, the following data are available: Maximum flow
of waste water is 750 m3/h and the average flow is 400 m3/h.The pump is operated
for 8,000 hours per year. Motor output is 70 kW. Average power input with three
control methods were compared: Throttling: 44.4 kW, On-off Control: 32.4 kW and
AC drive: 23.0 kW. AC drive compared to throttling gives:
Energy save about 172,000 kWh/year
Reduction in CO2 emissions 86,000 kg/year
Other benefits:
Payback period only 6 months
Accurate control of treatment process
Less reactive power required
[Top of the page]
[Tips by Industry]
[Tips by Application]
[Alphabetical Index]
|
|
|
Sewage pumps - AC drive instead of on-off control
|
A Dutch city has a sewage system in which both waste water and storm water from paved areas is collected.
A pumping station transports the water to the next station, or to the treatment plant.
In 15 stations the pumps are driven by AC drives. Energy savings are achieved under dry
weather conditions.
AC drive compared to on-off control gives:
Energy save about 150,000 kWh/year
Reduction in CO2 emissions 75,000 kg/year
Other benefits:
Less maintenance
Better control of treatment process
Less reactive power required
[Top of the page]
[Tips by Industry]
[Tips by Application]
[Alphabetical Index]
|
|
|
Ski lift - AC drive instead of constant speed
|
A ski resort manager had realised problems with constant speed ski-lifts
which were for some skiers too fast and for some others too slow. After looking
at several options the resort chose an AC drive (132 kW) as a replacement drive
for the ski lift. Among the other benefits clear energy saving was also
experienced.
Energy save about 26,400 kWh/year
Reduction in CO2 emissions 13,200 kg/year
Other benefits:
Safe and reliable lift and happy customers
Soft start increases comfort
Less reactive power required
[Top of the page]
[Tips by Industry]
[Tips by Application]
[Alphabetical Index]
|
|
|
Timber drying - AC drive instead of throttling
|
A Swedish company in woodworking business and the timber drying process
is one of the most energy-consuming parts of the process. Timber is dried in
kilns each having eight fans mantaining continuous air circulation. Previously
the fans were operated continuously at full speed. Company invested in a
total of eight AC drives two each installed in four kilns. Fan motors are 7.5 kW each.
Energy save about 900,000 kWh/year
Reduction in CO2 emissions 450,000 kg/year
Other benefits:
Payback of investment in 12 months
Better drying process
Better end-product
[Top of the page]
[Tips by Industry]
[Tips by Application]
[Alphabetical Index]
|
|
|
Water treatment pump - AC drive instead of on-off
|
An European water utility compared the energy consumption a fresh water pump with
existing On-off control against proposed variable speed AC drive. The
power demand at full volume (1000 m3/h) every half an hour was 85 kW
but at the average volume (500 m3/h) with AC drive speed control only 21 kW.
With 8000 h/year were results:
Energy save about 512,000 kWh/year
Reduction in CO2 emissions 256,000 kg/year
Other benefits:
Less maintenance with soft starting
Better water pressure control
Less reactive power
[Top of the page]
[Tips by Industry]
[Tips by Application]
[Alphabetical Index]
|
|
|
Wind power generator - AC drive instead of blades only
|
Conventionally, the wind generator is coupled directly to the electricity grid.
The speed of the generator is limited by the network frequency thus limiting the
speed range which can be exploited. By using AC drive it is estimated the
energy output can be increased by 20%. If the generator power is 1000 kW and
it is running 4000 h/year, we get:
Energy save about 800,000 kWh/year
Reduction in CO2 emissions 400,000 kg/year
Other benefits:
Less mechanical stress
Better controllability
Reactive power can be controlled
[Top of the page]
[Tips by Industry]
[Tips by Application]
[Alphabetical Index]
|
|
|